This can be about your Pure/Orcid link - you may need to relink the two systems or you may need to authorize the flow of data. So that ORCiD can look like your Pure record.
ORCiD ids will appear in your Pure profile but that does not mean they are linked or have been authorized.
And sometimes you may need to do it again.
To connect your existing ORCID iD to Pure:
If your Pure profile (internal to QUT) looks good this will ensure your ORCiD profile looks good (external to QUT).
Here are the ppt slides from the recent FBL "Enhancing your research visibility" presentation.
It includes:
Here are a few tips that will help you avoid the stress of a last minute rush to get your publication lists up to date before your PPR, a promotions round or grant application deadline. They will also magnify the impact of your research and make you famous! Perhaps that might be a bit of an exaggeration but they will definitely raise your profile online, increase the size of the audience for your work and save you time in the long run.
It’s important to make sure your Pure profile is up to date with all of your research outputs. Pure is the research administration tool that helps researchers and administrators manage publications and research projects. All QUT staff and HDR students have automatic access to Pure.
This video (opens in MediaHub) shows you how to keep your publications up-to-date quickly and easily.
It is recommended that you set an alert in your calendar for the last Friday of the month, to check your Pure profile and import or claim your publications. It’s also a nice reminder of how fabulous you are and the great work that you have done.
There are guides and information on importing your publications into Pure on the Digital Workplace (staff)/HiQ (students). Help is also available from your Liaison Librarian or QUT ePrints.
Your Masters & PhD theses will be made available via QUT eprints and requesting an embargo is possible.
Here are a few things to consider from our Scholarly Communications librarian:
We have also noticed an increase in the number of embargoed theses and the number of completed students requesting an extension to the 2 year embargo that was approved at the time of submission.
In some cases, the embargoes are being requested because the thesis includes one or more already published articles. However, we now know that most journal publishers have no problem with authors including their published articles in their thesis and then making that thesis available online via their university’s open access repository. CalTech have put together a list of links to publisher policies on this: https://libguides.caltech.edu/publisherpolicies As a result, we have stopped worrying about theses that contain published articles.
In other cases, an embargo is requested because the student wants to publish articles (or a book) based on their thesis and worries that the article may get rejected if the journal’s plagiarism detector software finds text matches between the manuscript and the thesis. The appropriate way to avoid this problem is to make sure you cite and reference your thesis if you ‘quote’ chunks of text from the thesis.
When pitching a book proposal that is based on a thesis, the download stats for the thesis can actually be useful as ‘demonstrated demand’ for a book on that topic. The finished book is likely to be a ‘re-write’ so the publishers generally don’t worry about the thesis being available. This is a quote from Harvard University Press “when we at HUP take on a young scholar’s first book, whether in history or other disciplines, we expect that the final product will be so broadened, deepened, reconsidered, and restructured that the availability of the dissertation is irrelevant.” However, some smaller presses are more restrictive (see list).
However, the ePrints Team is happy to apply or extend an embargo if it allays the thesis author’s concerns.
The vast majority of thesis authors are happy that people are able to read their thesis – after all the effort they put into writing it. Many of our ‘most downloaded’ documents are HDR theses. For example:
Check your Pure account to see if there is a Scopus import ‘Task’ waiting to be actioned.
Note: The lists of import candidates currently include a high proportion of duplicates of outputs that are already in Pure. In most cases, the existing Pure records are older publications migrated from ePrints but the import candidate from Scopus has minor differences. For newer publications, it may be that a QUT co-author has already imported the record.
Tips:
Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Australia License.
QUT acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the lands where QUT now stands.